Al-Imam Al-Qurtubi’s preferences in his book Al-Mufhim for what is problematic in summarizing Muslim’s book of Qasama- A Rhetorical Study-

Authors

  • Bedour Alwan Hussein Al_Janabi

    bed19i1008@uoanbar.edu.iq

    Anbar University - College of Islamic Sciences
  • Assist. Prof. Dr. Abed Mikhlif Jawad Al Fahdawi

    isl.abedmj@uoanbar.edu.iq

    Anbar University, College of Islamic Sciences

Abstract

This study includes an introduction, a preface, and five demands. The preface was in introducing Imam al-Qurtubi (may Allah have mercy on him).The first section was in the testimony of one witness to the wound. In it, Imentioned the sayings of the jurists and their evidence, indicating the correct opinion. The second section was the increase in faith over fifty. Al-Qasama has clarified the sayings of the jurists and their evidence and discussed them The most correct opinion. The third section of establishing retribution By Qasama, it showed the sayings of the jurists and their evidence, and discussed them The most correct opinion. The most correct one is according to the strength of the evidence, and then the study is concluded by a conclusion and references

Keywords:

Weightings, Al-Qurtubi, Al-Mufhim, Al-Qasama, acomparative jurisprudential study

Published

2022-12-10
free counter

How to Cite

بدور علوان حسين جران, & الفهداوي أ. د. ع. م. ج. . (2022). Al-Imam Al-Qurtubi’s preferences in his book Al-Mufhim for what is problematic in summarizing Muslim’s book of Qasama- A Rhetorical Study-. Researcher Journal of Islamic Sciences, 2(1), 274–286. Retrieved from https://uofrjis.net/index.php/new/article/view/125

Issue

Section

scientific research